Hierarchy, Part 1
"Prabhupāda: Secularism is
a bogus thing. You see? That is an indulgence, "Whatever you like, you can
do. Whatever religion you follow, that's all..." No. That is not good. The
state should be responsible for the spiritual progress of the citizens. Now,
especially in our country, we say it is Hindustan, Bhāratavarṣa. So we are not
giving the bhāratīya or Hindu spiritual cultural education. So that's a great
loss of the secular state.
Guest (4): Do you think
that the present democratic system will be able to impart a spiritual
education?
Prabhupāda: No.
Guest (4): Then what
system do you advocate?
Prabhupāda: Of course, so
far Vedic culture is concerned, they advocated monarchy because the one man's
training, a good king guided by the brahminical culture, although it was
autocratic sometimes, but because the king was very cultured there was no
possibility of doing any harm to the citizens. But democracy means simply they
are given the post by votes, and they may be all rascals. Then what they can
think of good to the citizens?"
"Guest (4): Where are they
to be trained, then? How are they . . .
Prabhupāda: That we are
proposing. When we open a center we shall train anyone. It doesn't matter
whether he is born in a śūdra family or Brahmin family. Just like they are born
in a different family other than Brahmin, but they are now Brahmin, because
after being trained up.
Guest (4): (indistinct) .
. . regard, you said that monarchy and democracy, both are systems which cannot
help this cause. Then . . .
Prabhupāda: No, why
cannot help? If . . . monarchy means the king was properly trained up.
Similarly, in the democracy, if people are properly trained up, then they will
vote for nice men and there will be nice government. Now, because the people
are not trained, they are practically asses. The votes of the asses, what has
the meaning? If the majority are asses, then one ass will be elected. That's
all. So when the executive head is an ass, what benefit he can do to the people?
Guest (5): I see."
(Room Conversation -- December 12, 1970, Indore)
Comments
Post a Comment