Euthanasia vs. Killing
"Although
Jaḍa Bharata was forced to carry the palanquin, he did not give up his
sympathetic feelings toward the poor ants passing on the road. A devotee of the
Lord does not forget his devotional service and other favorable activities,
even when he is in a most distressful condition. Jaḍa Bharata was a qualified
brāhmaṇa, highly elevated in spiritual knowledge, yet he was forced to carry
the palanquin. He did not mind this, but while walking on the road, he could
not forget his duty to avoid killing even an ant. A Vaiṣṇava is never envious
or unnecessarily violent. There were many ants on the path, but Jaḍa Bharata
took care by looking ahead three feet. When the ants were no longer in his way,
he would place his foot on the ground. A Vaiṣṇava is always very kind at heart
to all living entities. In His sāṅkhya-yoga, Lord Kapiladeva explains: suhṛdaḥ
sarva-dehinām. Living entities assume different bodily forms. Those who are not
Vaiṣṇavas consider only human society worthy of their sympathy, but Kṛṣṇa
claims to be the supreme father of all life forms. Consequently the Vaiṣṇava
takes care not to annihilate untimely or unnecessarily any life form. All
living entities have to fulfill a certain duration for being encaged in a
particular type of material body. They have to finish the duration allotted a
particular body before being promoted or evolved to another body. Killing an
animal or any other living being simply places an impediment in the way of his
completing his term of imprisonment in a certain body. One should therefore not
kill bodies for one’s sense gratification, for this will implicate one in
sinful activity."
(SB. 5.10.2)
Comments
Post a Comment