Modern science without God consciousness 2.
"The
materialistic man of the modern age will argue that life, or part of it, is
never meant for discussion of theosophical or theological arguments. Life is
meant for the maximum duration of existence for eating, drinking, sexual
intercourse, making merry and enjoying life. The modern man wants to live
forever by the advancement of material science, and there are many foolish
theories for prolonging life to the maximum duration. But the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam affirms
that life is not meant for so-called economic development or advancement
of materialistic science for the hedonistic philosophy of eating,
mating, drinking and merrymaking. Life is solely meant for tapasya, for
purifying existence so that one may enter into eternal life just after the end
of the human form of life.
The
materialists want to prolong life as much as possible because they have no
information of the next life. They want to get the maximum comforts in this
present life because they think conclusively that there is no life after death.
This ignorance about the eternity of the living being and the change of
covering in the material world has played havoc in the structure of modern
human society. Consequently there are many problems, multiplied by various
plans of modernized man. The plans for solving the problems of society have
only aggravated the troubles. Even if it is possible to prolong life more than
one hundred years, advancement of human civilization does not necessarily
follow. The Bhāgavatam says
that certain trees live for hundreds and thousands of years. At Vṛndāvana there
is a tamarind tree (the place is known as Imlitala) which is said to have
existed since the time of Lord Kṛṣṇa. In the Calcutta Botanical Garden there is
a banyan tree said to be older than five hundred years, and there are many such
trees all over the world. Svāmī Śaṅkarācārya lived only thirty-two years, and
Lord Caitanya lived forty-eight years. Does it mean that the prolonged lives of
the abovementioned trees are more important than Śaṅkara or Caitanya? Prolonged
life without spiritual value is not very important.
One
may doubt that trees have life because they do not breathe. But modern
scientists like Bose have already proved that there is life in plants, so
breathing is no sign of actual life. The Bhāgavatam says that the bellows of the
blacksmith breathes very soundly, but that does not mean that the bellows has
life. The materialist will argue that life in the tree and life in the man
cannot be compared because the tree cannot enjoy life by eating palatable dishes
or by enjoying sexual intercourse. In reply to this, the Bhāgavatam asks
whether other animals like the dogs and hogs, living in the same village with
human beings, do not eat and enjoy sexual life. The specific utterance of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in
regard to "other animals" means that persons who are simply engaged
in planning a better type of animal life consisting of eating, breathing and
mating are also animals in the shape of human beings. A society of such
polished animals cannot benefit suffering humanity, for an animal can easily
harm another animal but rarely do good."
(SB 2.3.18. Purport)
Comments
Post a Comment